In this post I am going to show that , the
th Bell number, is larger than
.
Our main tool will be Burnside’s lemma, which states that if a finite group acts on a finite set
, the average number of fixed points of the elements of
is equal to the number of orbits of the action of
on
:
where is the set of fixed points of
.
We let , the symmetric group on
letters, act on
component-wise. The elements of
are
-tuples consisting of integers between
and
. Now you may easily convince yourself that it is possible to send a tuple
to a tuple
if and only if whenever
, we also have
, and vice versa. In other words we view each
-tuple
as a function
; its fibres partition
, and composition with a permutation preserves the fibres of
. It is immediate that
and
are in the same orbit of
if and only if they have the same collection of fibres. For instance,
can be sent to
by the cycle
but there is no way to send
to
, because any permutation will send
to a 3-tuple of the form
.
Thus has
orbits on
. On the other hand since our permutations act component-wise, we have
i.e. the fixed points of acting on
are the tuples
consisting of fixed points of
acting on
. Therefore, by Burnside’s lemma, we have
In fact the same argument shows that for any , we have
In particular, the identity of fixes all of
, so we have
In fact, by using the fact that a permutation of consists of a subset of
(the subset of fixed points), and a derangement of the remaining elements, we easily obtain the formula
where is the number of derangements of a set of
elements.